New Research: Hospital Safety Practices Don’t Affect Patient Outcomes
The new research looked at the hospital scores of the Leapfrog Safe Practices Survey and correlated them with death rates or hospital infections. The Leapfrog Safe Practices are adopted by the National Quality Forum, which is a non-profit organization that receives government and private fund to improve patient safety and quality. In the study, the researchers were unable to establish a direct connection between the scores and the rates of death and infection by the hospital.
Wow. For weeks I have noted the decrease in hospital infections, and the need for better safety guidelines and practices. This study essentially flips the myriad of other studies on their head. But there could be other factors are play. For instance, maybe the hospitals that have better hospital safety practices generally take in more complicated cases or patients with a lower prospect of recovery.
Another issue could be they way hospitals report the safety compliance. If it is the hospital themselves completing the report, wouldn't that normally create a conflict of interests? I think there needs to be a stronger auditor influence and more enforcement of the safety protocols before there can be such a definitive research report such as this one. I think there are just too many variables, and that the safety protocols must be effective in certain situations for some hospitals.
But what do you think? I would love to hear from you! I welcome your phone call on my toll-free cell at 1-866-889-6882 or you can drop me an e-mail at email@example.com . You are always welcome to request my FREE book, The Seven Deadly Mistakes of Malpractice Victims, at the home page of my website at www.protectingpatientrights.com.